Congress Vote NO to killing plan!

I am writing this because finally the NY Times has had the moral courage to bring up the real subject in the news today. There are two articles in the NY Times about the attempt by the Congress to rewrite the basics of this nation and the outrage of the people about it. One of the articles i s about the states that are furious that the Congress is trying to override State’s rights. You may read that article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/us/29states.html?pagewanted=2&hpw/.

The other article is about the plan that was the plan all along and is the real intent of the fake reform bill and that is to codify premeditated killing of innocents as a so-called right. That evil is always a wrong. There is no such right as the right to kill one’s offspring!  The entire and sole purpose of the fake reform bill is to codify as public law abortion. There is NO ONE in this nation except those who profit from killing, who want any such law on our nation’s books. There is no law in the U S currently that authorizes any killing. The US Supreme Court has no authority whatsoever to write new laws. They never did. There is no law that authorizes abortion or codifies it as a ‘right.” For Congress to establish any new right requires a Constitutional Amendment that the people have to vote on and that 2/3 of the states have to agree on before it becomes law. That would NEVER happen in the U S and the wicked know it. That is why they are holding out the poison apple of ‘free insurance’ [that destroys the nation] and ‘health care for all’ [that kills the most vulnerable] and big oppressive government fining the poor for being poor and unable to afford BIG government premiums.

I am always opposed to any form of killing of innocents. There is no right to kill! There never will be. Because GOD is still GOD and HE is not mocked according to Galatians 6:7,  as written,’be not deceived. GOD is not mocked. For whatsoever a man [or nation] soweth that shall it also reap.”

 The nation that puts into place a plan to kill will be destroyed. If you doubt that then study history. Study the Bible. The nations who thought they could defy GOD HIMSELF and thrive are legion. They didn’t. They ceased to exist as world powers in 100% of the situations where they tried to write public laws mocking GOD. Study ancient Greece, ancient Rome, ancient civilizations all the way back too and including Mesopotamia, Canaan, the native American tribes that killed the white settlers, the Latin American Indian tribes that killed the missionaries, study each and every one and see for yourself where on the scale of world power they are today.

This nation cannot mock GOD and get away with it. GOD wrote in stone, “thou shalt not kill’ as a commandment and that commandment undoes every act of killing as legitimate. There is no such right as the right to kill one’s offspring in the womb. There never will be. GOD is not mocked! For the federal government big government despots like Obama/Hitler  who try to decieve all the people all the time with fancy words and deceitful lies there will be a judgement day from GOD.  How and when that will be is up to GOD HIMSELF. But it will happen because GOD promised  in many scriptures that HE avenges innocent blood shed.

Also read my entry for today at:

The Tapestry of My Life by Gloria Poole at this link:

http://gloriapoolepappas.blogspot.com for quotes from Solzhenitsyn warning America about a lack of moral courage and a refusal to accept moral absolute truths.

/s/ Gloria Poole @ Denver Colorado 80203/80206 ; @ 7:28 AM

29-Sept-2009

How I define socialism & Obama is Socialist

There are several op-ed pieces in the NY Times today about the meaning of socialism in 2009 but it is the same meaning whatever the year. I want to sum up how I define it from when I studied the opposite of it [the U S Constitution , and the Bible’s definition of liberty, and juxtapose the tenets of each so you understand the differences.  It is written, ‘…THE LORD [GOD] is that Spirit, and where THE SPIRIT of THE LORD is, there is liberty.” II Corinthians 3:17, King James Holy Bible . I am beginning with that scripture because it makes it plain that obedience to GOD and nations  listening too and obeying GOD brings liberty to the nation.  The republican Constitution is republican because it created a republic. The U S is a republic not a democracy. There are some so-called educated people in the U S and other countries also that never studied the forms of governments in any meaningful way and learned only canned programmed propaganda. I want to overcome that propaganda and teach people to think the right way according to GOD’s standards, because it is GOD’s standards you each will be judged by on HIS Final Day of Judgement, whether you are sent to heaven or to hell.

 A republic is defined as a country where the ‘supreme power is held by a certain portion of the people as a whole, who elect their representatives, and executive officers who are directly accountable to the people [able to be replaced at the next election.] Socialism is defined as “the economic doctrine that there should be public [government] ownership of the principal means of production and  wealth, and an ‘equitable’ redistribution of opportunity and the rewards of labor ” based upon the writings of Karl Marx. [Definitions from Winston’s English Dictionary .] In other words in socialism the government owns everything even your private personal property, and they give it to whomever they want;  and the government decides who prospers and who doesn’t, instead of the amount of labor and dedication one puts into one’s work.  A democracy is where the people themselves decide every issue and there is no representative government. An example would be if all citizens in the U S who had computers for instance voted on every bill presented to the nation to say yea or nay on.  The votes of the citizens would be tallied by computer and the majority votes would win in each situation. Each citizen would represent his or her own family own’s best interest, and there would be no Congress. I personally do not think a true democracy is do-able, workable for any nation because of the sheer numbers of people and because there would be no way to debate the issues except by internet, which is a pretty good method until socialists and/or communists’ tactics to suppress freedom of speech/ press/ religion/ to protest the government,  tried to take over the internt to prevent that public discussion of leaders in America.

The idea of a republic where a district votes to elect someone from their midst to represent them is a good idea, and it brings the different districts into a public setting supposedly –the Congress,though the visitors’ gallery there is policed like the KGB,and does not allow even a pen /pencil or sheet of paper to be taken into it–they are afraid you will write down how empty it was and who did not show up to vote, and how they voted and how the issues were not allowed debate but were decided by a committee of 5-6 people shutting out the senators from some states. I was threatened with arrest by the Capitol Police when I went to the U S Senate and U S House of Representatives at different times to sit in on the discussions and take notes. They said if I did not give them my pen and paper they’d arrest me! So much for liberty ! Or a free unregulated press either.  It is supposed to condense the ideas represented to what is good for the entire district, taking all citizens needs into account, but it is not a government decision-making power over every realm of your life.

When the government is making all the rules for every matter,that is socialism. When the government is buying up all real estate properties, and all industries that is socialism. When the government is fixing prices, that is socialism. When the government owns the banks and all the money that is socialism.  When the government is confiscating private property, that is socialism. When the government has an ‘everything belongs to everybody’ that is socialism. When the government is trying to manage the population that is socialism. When the government is killing off one class of people in order to give more ‘benefits’ to other classes of people that is socialism. When the government leaders have so entrenched themselves as to be able to be in office for 50 years with no competition that is socialism [and probably corruption too]. When there is no meaningful debate on the issues and the so-called “judiciary’ [legal ] committee decides what gets discussed and by whom, on floor of Congressional house of Senate or Representatives,that is socialism. When the government decides who gets a ‘permit’ to protest that is communism. When the government decides that there will not be any positive reference to GOD in any form in society, that is communism. Communism includes all those others plans of socialist but is more extreme, more to the left on the gradient, more invasive, more oppressive, more killing of humans physically and spiritually and psychologically. When the government is listening in on phone calls of the citizens and putting up cameras on the streets and hacking into privately owned computers, that is communism.

The progression is as follows:

 extreme communist–>socialism..>Constitutional Monarchy->republic.

As the people wake up and throw off repressive, oppressive regimes they seem to move through stages, and of course in some nations it goes backward  from republic to communist. Think of eastern Europe when the USSR took them over for decades.  I think when a nation forsakes GOD, then GOD leads them into bondage. Think of GOD sending the Jews into 400 years of bondage in Egypt, and then when they lamented and wailed and began to repent GOD led them from Egypt by Moses. GOD is in THE ONE who decides the outcomes of the leaders and HE raises up the leaders, {kings the Bible says] that will accomplish HIS plan at that time for those people. GOD told the people that HE should be THE ONLY GOD, but some demanded a king and GOD gave them a king and then they wailed about it. GOD said to them that such a leader over them would confiscate their wealth, conscript their boys into military, control the wives of their men, etc, but they would not listen. 

I am opposed to all the -ism governments including communism, socialism, buddhism, fascism, totalitarianism, that are all varying degrees of the bad idea that government should be all solutions. Governments have some solutions when there are restraints on them but when left unbridled they are like a runaway stallion. It takes a mighty strong force to stop them then. A better analogy that I have written often is that unrestrained government is like a steam roller set on a hill with the brake off. When it starts to slide it will be slam-bang to the bottom squashing everything and everybody in its path.

The U S Constitution restrained the powers of a federal [centralized]government and it restrained the powers of the states. But the socialists  in this nation removed the teaching of the words of the Constitution from the schools in probably the 1930’s [not sure –I was not alive then but that is when socialist movements began in America] . And I object when op-ed pieces tell the public that unless a person is a card-carrying member of the Socialist Party that it is ridiculous to call them that. IF they adhere too, and teach and believe and implement the doctrines of the socialist party they are socialists. If you call a pig a chicken it does not make it so. If it looks like a pig and smells like a pig, and snorts like a pig, and burrows in the muck  like a pig it is a pig, not a chicken. A Socialist is a person who believes the government is the answer to all problems. I believe GOD is the answer to all problems.  Obama is a socialist and so are the Clintons, and Nancy Pelosi and many in Congress and on the Supreme Court.

/s/ Gloria Poole, Denver Colorado 80203 @ 8:48 AM, 15-Sept-2009

Also note. that  I Gloria Poole am the only owner of this blog and wordpress account and obviously of my name Gloria. The added in links showing at the bottom of my entry in the preview that are defenses of Obama were put there by cybercriminals who hacked into my blog. I do not defend Obama because he is a socialist and a complicent in mass murders of innocents. And I do not appreciate cybercriminals hacking into any account of mine. For the record!

U.S. Human Life Matters, Vote PROLIFE!

Human Being in amniotic sac w/ placenta
Human Being in amniotic sac w/ placenta

I am adding this photo of mine* to this blog of mine for several reasons.

It is showing as added in the rough draft. I am praying it appears when published! But if not, then view a series of photos of medical images of human beings in the womb at :

http://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/

and read about the 16,000 Christian medical doctors and a former M.I.T research scientist suing the National Institute of Health to make them stop destroying tiny humans for ‘research’, at this site:

http://sites.google.com/site/wordslife/

If for some reason, [like yesterday when there was such a flood of traffic per computerworld to Google servers that Google was at risk] and the photos on these sites are not loading properly, then the same photos are on my respository sites at:

http://gloriapoole.me.uk/humans-in-womb-photos/

http://gloriapoole.com/teaching-life/

It is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay past time to make the civil liberties of humans in the womb, the number one priority of this nation. The civil liberties of blacks is a done deal, the civil liberties of native Indians is a done deal. and those groups could and should move on to the next civil rights march and that is for the innocents in the womb.

I read in the NY Times today and article that Harvard University has a policy to prevent its medical students and /or staff/ professors from talking to the media. Obviously that is a violation of the First Amendment from the get-go! But Harvard Law school is the lynchpin of that abomination abortion on demand, and it is trying to hold onto its killing record numbers of embryoes in the false name of research AND its Christian endowments at the same time.  Their plan was to exercise prior restraint of civil liberties of anyone educated enough to know that killing of humans is a wrong, not a right.  I have long opposed Harvard and their lack of real education in truth, and medical facts to their student body en masse, and for that matter every University that graduates students without so much as one science class or one anatomy class. How is it possible to call a person ‘learned’ as the Bible writes or ‘college-educated’ who has merely been trained to recite dogma of the Planned Parenthood killing group or of the Centre for Reproductive [Killing] so-called rights, evil groups?  How is it possible to call a person educated whose entire college experience was built on basketball, buying term papers and influence? How is it possible that so called college-educated people in the U S could graduate from Harvard or any University with no math or finance classes, no science or anatomy or biology classes? How is it possible that they could spend upwards of $100,000 at Harvard usually of other people’s money and learn almost nothing but how to get elected to office?

This entry today at 8:17 AM, 2-Sept-2009 by me Gloria Poole, R.N. and owner of this blog acct and this blog and of course, my very name, is about pushing for the nation to recognize that the citizens of this nation have a duty to represent the nation and to vote into office prolifers and to not vote in those who are not prolife. And to not allow any group Harvard or otherwise to usurp civil liberties of speech, press, liberty to worship GOD and adhere to HIS Commandments and teach others to do so also, and the liberty to protest government.

/s/ Gloria Poole, R.N. artist and photographer writer,

* footnote: these digital photos are my own photos but the original paper photos are from a medical textbook entitled ” From Conception to Birth: The Drama of Life’s Beginnings’ by Roberts Rugh and Landrum B Shettles, M.D.s and it is a most wonderful book. Dr Rugh was a professor at College of  Physicians and Surgeons in NY and a graduate of Columbia University when the book was written. And Dr Shettles was a graduate of Johns Hopkins University of Medicine and a professor of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology at the same Physicians and Surgeons in NY, at the time they wrote this book. Richard N Einhorn  who colloborated with them was a winner of the Jesse Neal Editorial Achievement Award and a Sloan-Rockefeller Fellow in the Advanced Science Writing program at Columbia University at the time. I thank them publicly for the wonderful book they wrote that is one of the most excellent prolife resources I have ever encountered.  I rephotographed a few of  their photos and put a few of them on the news for life site for teaching purposes only, not for commercial gain. FYI.  In other words, used in the guidelines of fair use for teaching purposes of copyright laws.

Massachusetts,please select prolifer!

Human Being in amniotic sac w/ placenta
Human Being in amniotic sac w/ placenta

I am adding this photo of mine* to this blog of mine for several reasons.

It is showing as added in the rough draft. I am praying it appears when published! But if not, then view a series of photos of medical images of human beings in the womb at :

http://sites.google.com/site/newsforlife/humans-in-womb-photos/

and read about the 16,000 Christian medical doctors and a former M.I.T research scientist suing the National Institute of Health to make them stop destroying tiny humans for ‘research’, at this site:

http://sites.google.com/site/wordslife/

If for some reason, [like yesterday when there was such a flood of traffic per computerworld to Google servers that Google was at risk] and the photos on these sites are not loading properly, then the same photos are on my respository sites at:

http://gloriapoole.me.uk/humans-in-womb-photos/

http://gloriapoole.com/teaching-life/

It is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay past time to make the civil liberties of humans in the womb, the number one priority of this nation. The civil liberties of blacks is a done deal, the civil liberties of native Indians is a done deal. and those groups could and should move on to the next civil rights march and that is for the innocents in the womb.

I read in the NY Times today and article that Harvard University has a policy to prevent its medical students and /or staff/ professors from talking to the media. Obviously that is a violation of the First Amendment from the get-go! But Harvard Law school is the lynchpin of that abomination abortion on demand, and it is trying to hold onto its killing record numbers of embryoes in the false name of research AND its Christian endowments at the same time.  Their plan was to exercise prior restraint of civil liberties of anyone educated enough to know that killing of humans is a wrong, not a right.  I have long opposed Harvard and their lack of real education in truth, and medical facts to their student body en masse, and for that matter every University that graduates students without so much as one science class or one anatomy class. How is it possible to call a person ‘learned’ as the Bible writes or ‘college-educated’ who has merely been trained to recite dogma of the Planned Parenthood killing group or of the Centre for Reproductive [Killing] so-called rights, evil groups?  How is it possible to call a person educated whose entire college experience was built on basketball, buying term papers and influence? How is it possible that so called college-educated people in the U S could graduate from Harvard or any University with no math or finance classes, no science or anatomy or biology classes? How is it possible that they could spend upwards of $100,000 at Harvard usually of other people’s money and learn almost nothing but how to get elected to office?

This entry today at 8:17 AM, 2-Sept-2009 by me Gloria Poole, R.N. and owner of this blog acct and this blog and of course, my very name, is about pushing for the nation to recognize that the citizens of this nation have a duty to represent the nation and to vote into office prolifers and to not vote in those who are not prolife. And to not allow any group Harvard or otherwise to usurp civil liberties of speech, press, liberty to worship GOD and adhere to HIS Commandments and teach others to do so also, and the liberty to protest government.

/s/ Gloria Poole, R.N. artist and photographer writer,